Notes:

For terminology definitions and calculations, please refer to the worldsteel publication Safety and health principles and definitions available at worldsteel.org.

The data in this document is provisional and may be updated or supplemented with additional information.

Foreword

Welcome to the World Steel Association’s 2025 safety and health in the steel industry data report. This report is based on data provided by our members and offers crucial insights into our industry’s ongoing commitment to safety and the well-being of our workforce.

In 2024, worldsteel’s members reported 67 fatalities globally, representing a global fatal frequency rate (FFR) of 0.016, the lowest on record. Additionally, our global lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR) is at 0.70, which is also the lowest on record.

The steel industry is clearly making improvements in safety and health through learning exchanges and technology use. We are committed to achieving the goal of zero harm for employees and contractors.

Although lagging metrics are important, worldsteel consistently advises against using only these metrics as benchmarks. To support this, worldsteel endorses the adoption of evolving approaches in safety and health management used by our leading members. One of our challenges this year will be to revisit our metrics, focusing on the prevention of high-potential incidents and illness.

Our emphasis remains on process safety management (PSM) while addressing contractor vulnerabilities and fall from height incidents, the leading cause of fatalities in recent years.

Promoting holistic wellbeing in the global steel industry is crucial. We must continue striving for excellence in safety and health to ensure a safer, healthier future for everyone.

Andrew Purvis
Director, Sustainable Manufacturing

It is important that we promote a culture of holistic wellbeing for everyone in the global steel industry. Together, let us continue to strive for excellence in safety and health, ensuring a safer, healthier future for all.

worldsteel’s position on lagging indicators

The most popular lagging indicators, such as LTIFR or total recordable injury frequency rate (TRIFR), will be kept within the worldsteel reporting framework and as a reference of the industry’s general performance.

However, comparisons between organisations or local sites should not be made using LTIFR or TRIFR.

Below are the main reasons:

  • These indicators correlate poorly with the severity of accidents and injuries and do not provide a valid or reliable measure of safety and health controls and initiatives.
  • A smaller organisation’s LTIFR or TRIFR is more significantly affected by a single incident but this doesn’t necessarily indicate a more dangerous working environment.
  • Although worldsteel has a definition for lost time injury (LTI) and total recordable injury (TRI), companies vary in their definition of what constitutes an LTI and TRI.

These two indicators should not be part of individual, team or organisation objectives, bonuses, or incentives as they can foster a negative attitude towards reporting, limiting the organisational ability to learn and improve.

InfraBuild

Potential serious injuries and fatalities (PSIF)

A serious injury is a permanent impairment or life-altering state, or an injury that, if not immediately addressed, will lead to death or permanent or long-term impairment.

A potential serious injury or fatality is a near miss incident that could have resulted in a serious injury or fatality (PSIF) if not for specific barriers or countermeasures or if one factor around the event had been changed.

A precursor of PSIF is a high-risk situation in which control methods are absent, ineffective, or not complied with, and if allowed to continue, would potentially result in a fatality or serious injury.

The number of individual sites reporting to worldsteel using of the PSIF framework has increased in recent years. The figures below only represent the sites reporting PSIFs and combining contractors and employees.

Figure 1: PSIF triangle 2024 for employees and contractors

* In 2024, there were 67 fatalities reported to worldsteel. In order to preserve the ratios within the PSIF section of this report, fatalities reported by organisations that were not able to provide PSIF information have been excluded from this analysis.

** All other injuries includes Restricted Work Cases (RWC), Medically Treated Injuries (MTI) and Minor Injuries (MI).

Stated injury statistics in this graphic are derived from companies that report PSIF information to worldsteel.

Ternium
POSCO

Total recordable injury frequency rate (TRIFR)

Total recordable incidents comprise fatalities, LTIs, RWCs and MTIs. In the data survey, restricted work cases and MTIs are reported separately. Working hours are counted only on-sites that have reported at least one RWC or MTI.

CombinedContractorsEmployees
20184.92.96.3
20194.82.96.2
20203.52.34.2
20214.022.694.93
20224.742.716.43
20236.202.639.31
20243.541.835.54
AttributeValues
1. Fatalities*61
2. Lost time injuries2584
3. Restricted work cases3288
4. Medical treatment injuries6657
5. Minor injuries12361
6. Near misses (incidents)195767
7. Unsafe acts and situations3369807

* In 2024, there were 67 fatalities reported to worldsteel. In order to preserve the ratios within the TRIFR section of this report, fatalities reported by organisations that were not able to provide TRIFR information have been excluded from this analysis.

Safety pyramids can be used to compare the shape of a company’s incident triangle. In case the company triangle is narrower, it could mean that not all incidents are reported, or that fatality prevention requires more attention. It should be noted that the average incident triangle is not necessarily optimal; it should probably be wider. Reducing the number of more minor incidents does not directly reduce the probability of severe incidents, but having those reported allows action to be taken to mitigate risks that might otherwise cause severe incidents.

Figure 4: Safety pyramids 2024 for employees and contractors

AttributeValue
1. Fatalities19
2. Lost time injuries1778
3. Restricted work cases2804
4. Medical treatment injuries4478
5. Minor injuries8572
6. Near misses159393
7. Unsafe acts and situations2199167
AttributeValue
1. Fatalities42
2. Lost time injuries806
3. Restricted work case484
4. Medical treatment injuries2179
5. Minor injuries3789
6. Near misses36374
7. Unsafe acts and situations1170640
ArcelorMittal

Table 1: Ratio LTIs vs fatalities 2005-2024

CauseLTIsFatalitiesRatio LTIs per 1 fatality
Gassing and asphyxiation2831441.97
Explosion255982.60
Rail229782.94
Fire382834.60
Electrical502885.70
Structural failure356586.14
Fall from height2 1623306.55
On-site road vehicle1 0051367.39
Overhead crane1 0531079.84
Forklift3563510.17
Moving machinery3 34931610.60
Hot metal8336912.07
Falling object2 25217812.65
Other mobile equipment8855615.80
Hot substances6702823.93
Off site road vehicle3501425.00
Product loading6931838.50
Product handling storage2 2103858.16
Exposure to chemicals219373.00
Manual tasks tools3 65510365.50
Slip, trip and fall4 4956749.17

 

The table shows the ratio between lost time injuries and fatalities by causes. Low ratios mean that per fatality, there are, on average, only a small amount of lost time injuries; a high ratio indicates there are many lost time injuries per fatality. If these were drawn as an incident triangle for each cause, the triangles for the low ratios would be very narrow.

These ratios show that to prevent fatalities, it is more important to undertake comprehensive and robust incident investigations and instigate preventive measures for those incidents with a low ratio. It is precisely these incidents that are most likely to lead to fatalities without effective prevention. These ratios also emphasise the usefulness of categorising potential serious injuries and fatalities among other incidents.

Baotou

Lost time injury (LTI) analysis

Any work-related injury resulting in the employee or contractor being unable to return to work for their next scheduled work period. Returning to work with work restrictions does not constitute an LTI status, no matter how minimal or severe the restrictions, provided it is at the employee’s next scheduled shift. However, if an injury deteriorates and time is later lost, a LTI should be recorded. The LTIFR is calculated by combining fatalities and LTIs.

ContractorsEmployeesTotal
2015115133664517
201692531294054
201774328353578
201892324293352
2019100222113213
202088121673048
202187020752945
2022108320043087
202396918022771
202484817972645
EmployeesContractorsCombined
20151.480.721.17
20161.210.641.01
20171.250.520.97
20181.030.560.84
20190.940.650.83
20200.870.600.77
20211.050.590.85
20221.050.630.85
20230.980.500.74
20241.010.430.70

Figure 7: Causes of LTIs 2015-2024 for employees and contractors combined

AttributeValue
Manual tasks tools509
Slip, trip and fall447
Moving machinery164
Unknown161
Falling object153
Fall from height138
Product handling storage100
Hot substances80
Object in the eye66
Overhead crane59
On site road vehicle58
Hot metal55
Other mobile equipment53
Electrical38
Forklift33
Fire29
Exposure to chemicals21
Product loading20
Gassing and asphyxiation18
Structural failure14
Explosion13
Off site road vehicle4
Rail2
AttributeValue
Slip, trip and fall2459
Manual tasks tools2164
Moving machinery875
Fall from height702
Falling object671
Product handling storage576
Overhead crane337
Hot substances333
Unknown315
On site road vehicle288
Hot metal223
Object in the eye217
Other mobile equipment190
Electrical143
Forklift121
Fire119
Exposure to chemicals116
Product loading101
Gassing and asphyxiation94
Explosion82
Off site road vehicle59
Structural failure52
Rail47
AttributeValue
Slip, trip and fall4495
Manual tasks tools3655
Moving machinery2078
Fall from height1444
Falling object1359
Product handling storage1074
Unknown904
Overhead crane684
Hot substances672
On site road vehicle623
Hot metal496
Object in the eye445
Other mobile equipment417
Electrical323
Product loading253
Fire226
Exposure to Chemicals219
Off site road vehicle217
Forklift215
Gassing and asphyxiation197
Explosion142
Structural failure119
Rail111

The following graphs show the distribution of causes separated by employees and contractors.

Figure 8: Causes of LTIs in 2024 for employees and contractors

AttributeValue
Manual tasks tools361
Slip, trip and fall328
Moving machinery126
Falling object76
Product handling & storage73
Fall from height72
Hot substances56
Object in the eye54
Overhead crane48
Unknown45
Hot metal39
On site road vehicle32
Other mobile equipment28
Electrical26
Forklift20
Fire15
Exposure to chemicals13
Gassing and asphyxiation10
Product loading8
Structural failure5
Explosion5
Off site road vehicle3
AttributeValue
Manual tasks tools148
Slip, trip and fall119
Unknown116
Falling object77
Fall from height66
Moving machinery38
Product handling storage27
On site road vehicle26
Other mobile equipment25
Hot substances24
Hot metal16
Fire14
Forklift13
Product loading12
Object in the eye12
Electrical12
Overhead crane11
Structural failure9
Gassing and asphyxiation8
Exposure to chemicals8
Explosion8
Rail2
Off site road vehicle1

Fatality analysis

Death from a work-related injury, certified by a medical professional. The fatality frequency rate (FFR) is calculated as the number of fatalities per million hours worked.

EmployeesContractorsChina (indirect data)Totals
2015536932154
2016455727129
2017404915104
2018704822140
201932491899
2020385612106
2021455511111
202228717106
20232548982
20241942667

* Data received from China via Sinosteel Wuhan Safety & Environmental Protection Research Institute (SEPRI) does not distinguish between employees and contractors. Data received directly from Chinese worldsteel members does and is included in the analysis.

EmployeesContractorsCombined
20150.0230.0430.032
20160.0170.0400.025
20170.0180.0340.024
20180.0300.0290.029
20190.0140.0320.021
20200.0150.0380.024
20210.0230.0370.029
20220.0150.0410.027
20230.0140.0250.019
20240.0110.0210.016
Nucor

Figure 11: Causes of fatalities 2015-2024

AttributeValue
Fall from height10
Moving machinery8
On site road vehicle6
Hot substances6
Falling object5
Explosion5
Rail4
Electrical4
Hot metal3
Gassing and asphyxiation3
Overhead crane2
Manual tasks tools2
Structural failure1
Other mobile equipment1
Fire1
AttributeValue
Fall from height76
Moving machinery63
Gassing and asphyxiation37
On site road vehicle33
Falling object27
Overhead crane24
Electrical22
Structural failure20
Explosion19
Hot substances16
Fire16
Hot metal14
Rail10
Other mobile equipment10
Forklift6
Product handling storage5
Manual tasks tools4
Exposure to chemicals3
Slips, trips and falls2
Off site road vehicle2
Product loading1
AttributeValue
Fall from height164
Moving machinery139
On site road vehicle77
Gassing and asphyxiation76
Falling object67
Overhead crane45
Electrical41
Fire37
Hot metal35
Explosion30
Structural failure29
Rail28
Hot substances28
Other mobile equipment20
Forklift14
Product handling storage12
Manual tasks tools10
Slips, trips and falls6
Product loading6
Off site road vehicle6
Exposure to chemicals3
Unknown1

The top 5 causes of fatalities over the past decade were falling from height, moving machinery, on-site road vehicles, gassing, and asphyxiation and falling objects. These are consistent over time.

The following graphs show the distribution of causes split by employees and contractors.

AttributeValue
Explosion4
On-site road vehicle3
Rail2
Gassing and asphyxiation2
Fall from height2
Overhead crane1
Moving machinery1
Manual tasks tools1
Hot metal1
Fire1
Falling object1
Electrical1
AttributeValue
Fall from height8
Moving machinery7
Hot substances6
Falling object4
On-site road vehicle3
Electrical3
Rail2
Hot metal2
Structural failure1
Overhead crane1
Other mobile equipment1
Manual tasks tools1
Gassing asphyxiation1
Explosion1
Harsco

Process safety management (PSM) analysis

Process safety management (PSM) is a blend of operational, engineering and management skills focused on preventing catastrophic accidents and near misses, particularly explosions, fires, structural collapse, and damaging releases associated with a loss of containment of energy or dangerous substances such as molten metals, fuels, and chemicals.

The manufacturing of steel involves processes with intrinsic hazards that need careful management. The measures required to control these hazards are often complex. The focus of process safety management is not limited to protecting the people within the company but also includes the environment, assets, and the surrounding community.

Figure 13: PSM maturity assessment results 2024

The process safety management maturity analysis was derived from data provided by 36 organisations, representing 35.6% of worldsteel members.

Increasing maturity in process safety management can be observed. The industry has grown in experience and expertise in process safety management.

However, there are some important areas of improvement for elements 03 (stakeholders), 15 (measurement and metrics), and 16 (auditing). Process Safety KPIs are different from Occupational Safety KPIs. A specific set of indicators and guidance are being developed for process safety.

Table 2: Significant process safety events 2024

FiresExplosionsMolten metal and water reactionsGas and liquid
releases
Quantity491591071 011
Gerdau

Sickness absence

Sickness absence [percentage] is calculated as the total number of hours of sickness absence per total work hours. This indicator is only calculated for employees.

The following table shows the sickness absence per region.

Table 3: Sickness absence per region 2015 – 2024

% Sickness Absence2015201620172018201920202021202220232024
Africa and Middle East (AME)0.130.250.230.291.060.181.011.532.801.19
Asia/Pacific0.120.080.080.190.150.050.110.690.580.06
Russia & other CIS + Ukraine0.751.261.410.61.381.881.732.332.211.66
Europe1.112.022.261.923.323.894.366.383.843.25
North America0.140.140.140.230.220.420.141.311.273.5
South America0.30.530.480.430.750.460.423.031.591.28

 

JSW
Usiminas