For terminology definitions and calculations, please refer to the worldsteel publication Safety and health principles and definitions available at worldsteel.org

Foreword

worldsteel’s safety and health benchmarking is based on balanced and collective metrics.

Monitoring and reporting on accidents and diseases globally ensures adequate risk-based prioritisation and focused global efforts to guarantee the availability of adequate and effective risk controls. Openness and transparency are key to improving safety and health in the steel industry.

The safety statistics for 2022 were derived from data provided by 55 organisations, representing 60% of worldsteel members. In terms of crude steel production coverage, worldsteel collected data covering 487 Mt of crude steel, corresponding to 26.6% of global crude steel production.

In terms of general industry performance, this report shows progress, with lagging indicators reaching record lows. However, despite this cause for cautious optimism, it is important to recognise that 85 fatalities were reported to worldsteel in 2022. Our immediate focus needs to remain on the reduction and elimination of fatalities across our industry.

Qatar Steel

worldsteel’s position on lagging indicators

The most popular lagging indicators, such as lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR) or total recordable injury frequency rate (TRIFR), will be kept within the worldsteel reporting framework and as a reference of the industry’s general performance.

However, comparisons between organisations or local sites should not be made using LTIFR or TRIFR.

Below are the main reasons:

  • These indicators correlate poorly with the severity of accidents and injuries and do not provide a valid or reliable measure of safety and health controls and initiatives.
  • The size of an organisation (number of hours) positively impacts injury frequency rates. The number of hours worked (global and regional) don’t allow a comparison on a like-to-like basis.
  • Although worldsteel has a definition for lost time injury (LTI) and total recordable injury (TRI), companies vary in their definition of what constitutes an LTI and TRI.

These two indicators should not be part of individual, team or organisation objectives, bonuses, or incentives as they can foster a negative attitude towards reporting, limiting the organisational ability to learn and improve.

Safety and health reporting frameworks are evolving. To keep up, our industry must invest resources and time to better monitor safety and health performance. This will result in more effective and reliable data to reflect the true story and the challenges of our operations and people.

Potential serious injuries and fatalities (PSIF)

A Serious injury is a permanent impairment or life-altering state, or an injury that, if not immediately addressed, will lead to death or permanent or long-term impairment.

A Potential serious injury or fatality is a near miss incident that could have resulted in a serious injury or fatality if not for specific barriers or countermeasures or if one factor around the event had been changed.

A precursor of PSIF is a high-risk situation in which control methods are absent, ineffective, or not complied with, and if allowed to continue, would potentially result in a fatality or serious injury.

The number of individual sites reporting to worldsteel the use of the PSIF framework has increased in recent years. The figures below only include data from companies/sites reporting PSIFs and combine contractors and employees.

Figure 1: Potential serious injuries and fatalities triangle 2022 for employees and contractors

* In 2022 there were 85 fatalities reported to worldsteel. In order to preserve the ratios within the PSIF section of this report, Fatalities reported by
organisations that were not able to provide PSIF information have been excluded from this analysis.
** All other injuries includes Restricted Work Cases (RWC), Medically Treated Injuries (MTI) and Minor Injuries (MI)
Tata Steel
TenarisConfab - Brazil

Total recordable injury frequency rate (TRIFR)

Total recordable incidents comprise fatalities (F), lost time injuries (LTI), restricted work cases (RWC) and medically treated injuries (MTI). In the data survey, restricted work cases and medically treated injuries are reported separately. Working hours are counted only on sites that have reported at least one restricted work case or medically treated injury.

Figure 2: Total recordable injury frequency rate 2017-2022

EmployeesContractorsCombined
20174.84.04.5
20186.32.94.9
20196.22.94.8
20204.32.43.6
20214.932.694.02
20224.822.553.75

Figure 3: Safety pyramid 2022

AttributeValue
1. Fatalities78
2. Lost time injuries2399
3. Restricted work cases1010
4. Medical treatment injuries4240
5. Minor injuries14668
6. Near misses (incidents)192932
7. Unsafe acts and situations3205987

* In 2022, there were 85 fatalities reported to worldsteel. In order to preserve the ratios within the TRIFR section of this report, Fatalities reported by organisations that were not able to provide TRIFR information have been excluded from this analysis.

 

Safety pyramids can be used to compare the shape of a company’s incident triangle. In case the company triangle is narrower, it could mean that not all incidents are reported, or that fatality prevention requires more attention. It should be noted that the average incident triangle is not necessarily optimal; it should probably be wider. Reducing the number of more minor incidents does not directly reduce the probability of severe incidents, but having those reported allows action to be taken to mitigate risks that might otherwise cause severe incidents.

Figure 4: Safety pyramids 2022 for employees and contractors

PYRAMIDValue
1. Fatalities25
2. Lost time injuries1609
3. Restricted work cases608
4. Medical treatment injuries2896
5. Minor injuries11475
6. Near misses166158
7. Unsafe acts and situations2794724
PYRAMIDValue
1. Fatalities53
2. Lost time injuries790
3. Restricted work case402
4. Medical treatment injuries1344
5. Minor injuries3193
6. Near misses26774
7. Unsafe acts and situations411263

Table 1: Ratio lost time injuries vs fatalities 2004-2022

CauseLost Time Injuries (LTIs)FatalitiesRatio LTI per 1 Fatality
Gassing and asphyxiation2271361.67
Explosion228922.48
Rail216732.96
Fire320744.32
Electrical425765.59
Structural failure325555.91
Fall from height18493066.04
On site road vehicle8561256.85
Forklift286338.67
Overhead crane885998.94
Moving machinery300329110.32
Hot metal7186311.40
Falling object189616411.56
Other mobile equipment7905215.19
Off site road vehicle3221324.77
Hot substances4601530.67
Product loading6501738.24
Product handling storage19363850.95
Exposure to chemicals172357.33
Manual tasks tools24167345.14
Slip, trip and fall33006550.00

The types of injuries with the smallest ratio between lost time injuries and fatalities are covered by process safety events.

Companies should act if they are experiencing lost time injuries of this nature. A PSIF approach should be used, and leading and lagging process safety-focused metrics should be in place.

The table shows the ratio between lost time injuries and fatalities by cause. Small ratios mean that per fatality, there are, on average, only a small amount of lost time injuries; a big ratio indicates there are many lost time injuries per fatality. If these were drawn as an incident triangle for each cause, the triangles for the small ratios would be very narrow.

These ratios show that to prevent fatalities, it is more important to undertake comprehensive and robust incident investigations and instigate preventive measures for those incidents with a low ratio. It is precisely these incidents that are most likely to lead to Fatalities without effective prevention. These ratios also emphasise the usefulness of categorising potential serious injuries and fatalities among other incidents. Please see the next chapter for further information on this.

Lost time injury (LTI) analysis

Lost time injury (LTI). Any work-related injury resulting in the employee or contractor being unable to return to work for their next scheduled work period. Returning to work with work restrictions does not constitute a lost time injury status, no matter how minimal or severe the restrictions, provided it is at the employee’s next scheduled shift. However, if an Injury deteriorates and time is later lost, an LTI should be recorded. Lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR) is calculated by combining fatalities and LTIs.

Figure 5: Number of lost time injuries, 2013-2022

 

ContractorsEmployees
201312824500
201413303710
201511513366
20169253129
20177432835
20189232429
201910022211
20208462021
20218702075
20228431634

Figure 6: Lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR), 2013-2022

EmployeesContractorsCombined
20132.000.941.60
20141.760.881.39
20151.480.721.17
20161.210.641.01
20171.250.520.97
20181.030.560.84
20190.940.650.83
20200.980.660.85
20211.050.590.85
20220.850.450.65

Figure 7: Causes of lost time injuries 2013-2022

AttributeValue
Slip, trip and fall440
Manual tasks tools413
Moving machinery119
Product handling storage117
Fall from height105
Falling object95
On site road vehicle50
Hot substances48
Overhead crane46
Hot metal43
Object in the eye38
Other mobile equipment36
Forklift25
Product loading23
Exposure to chemicals22
Explosion19
Gassing and asphyxiation14
Electrical13
Fire13
Off site road vehicle10
Structural failure8
Rail7
Unknown6
AttributeValue
Slip, trip and fall1762
Manual tasks tools1265
Moving machinery949
Fall from height659
Falling object518
Product handling storage449
Overhead crane252
On site road vehicle245
Hot substances238
Hot metal204
Unknown150
Other mobile equipment144
Object in the eye136
Electrical121
Off site road vehicle97
Exposure to chemicals94
Product loading91
Forklift84
Fire76
Gassing and asphyxiation69
Rail61
Explosion55
Structural failure46
AttributeValue
Slip, trip and fall2943
Moving machinery2606
Manual tasks tools2134
Falling object1643
Fall from height1636
Product handling storage1429
Overhead crane738
Other mobile equipment655
On site road vehicle644
Unknown629
Hot metal545
Product loading466
Hot substances417
Electrical334
Object in the eye289
Off site road vehicle270
Forklift260
Fire256
Structural failure256
Gassing and asphyxiation191
Rail176
Explosion156
Exposure to chemicals150

The following graphs show the distribution of causes separated by employees and contractors.

Figure 8: Causes of lost time injuries in 2022 for employees and contractors

 

Causes of lost time injuries – contractors 2022

Value
Slip, trip and fall123
Manual tasks tools78
Fall from height70
Falling object47
Product handling storage37
Moving machinery34
On site road vehicle32
Unknow32
Other mobile equipment20
Overhead crane15
Product loading14
Gassing and asphyxiation12
Hot substances9
Electrical8
Exposure to chemicals8
Rail7
Structural failure7
Fire5
Hot metal5
Forklift3
Object in the eye3
Explosion2

Causes of lost time injuries – employees 2022

AttributeValue
Slip, trip and fall304
Manual tasks tools211
Moving machinery93
Falling object61
Product handling storage61
Fall from height45
Overhead crane30
Hot metal29
Hot substances29
Object in the eye28
Other mobile equipment27
On site road vehicle24
Forklift14
Product loading13
Explosion11
Off site road vehicle10
Fire8
Exposure to chemicals7
Gassing and asphyxiation7
Electrical6
Rail5
Structural failure4
Unknown3

The top five causes of lost time injury in 2022 for both employees and contractors were: slipping, tripping and falling, use of manual tools, moving machinery, product handling and falling from height.

Engineer among the cold rolled coils

Fatality analysis

Death from a work-related injury, certified by a medical professional. Fatality Frequency Rate (FFR) is calculated on the number of Fatalities per million man hours.

Figure 9: Number of fatalities 2013-2022

China (indirect data)ContractorsEmployees
2013357765
2014206644
2015326953
2016275745
2017154940
2018224870
2019194932
2020155034
2021115545
202275325

* Data received from China via Sinosteel Wuhan Safety & Environmental Protection Research Institute (SEPRI) does not distinguish between employees and contractors. Data received directly from Chinese worldsteel members does and is included in the analysis.

Figure 10: Fatality frequency rate 2013-2022

EmployeesContractorsCombined
20130.0290.0570.039
20140.0210.0440.030
20150.0230.0430.032
20160.0170.0400.025
20170.0180.0340.024
20180.0300.0290.029
20190.0140.0320.021
20200.0160.0390.025
20210.0230.0370.029
20220.0130.0280.020

Figure 11: Causes of fatalities 2013-2022

AttributeValue
Moving machinery11
On site road vehicle10
Structural failure10
Fall from height9
Falling object4
Gassing and asphyxiation4
Hot metal4
Product handling storage4
Electrical3
Forklift3
Explosion2
Hot Substances2
Other mobile equipment2
Overhead crane2
Rail2
Fire1
Manual tasks tools1
AttributeValue
Fall from height74
Moving machinery69
Gassing and asphyxiation52
On site road vehicle39
Overhead crane28
Falling object27
Fire23
Structural failure20
Electrical15
Explosion15
Hot metal12
Other mobile equipment11
Rail11
Forklift8
Hot substances8
Product handling storage7
Exposure to chemicals3
Manual tasks tools3
Off site road vehicle3
Product loading2
Slips, trips and falls2
AttributeValue
Fall from height172
Moving machinery150
On site road vehicle80
Falling object78
Gassing and asphyxiation72
Overhead crane51
Explosion48
Structural failure37
Electrical35
Hot metal35
Fire31
Rail31
Other mobile equipment28
Forklift19
Hot substances17
Product handling storage13
Product loading9
Manual tasks tools7
Off site road vehicle7
Slips, trips and falls6
Exposure to chemicals3
Unknown1

The following graphs show the distribution of causes split by employees and contractors.

Figure 12: Causes of employee fatalities in 2022

AttributeValue
Moving machinery5
Structural failure5
On site road vehicle3
Forklift2
Rail Employees2
Electrical1
Explosion1
Falling object1
Gassing and asphyxiation1
Hot metal1
Hot substances1
Product handling storage1

Figure 13: Causes of contractor fatalities in 2022

AttributeValue
Fall from height9
On site road vehicle7
Moving machinery6
Structural failure5
Falling object3
Gassing and asphyxiation3
Hot metal3
Product handling storage3
Electrical2
Other mobile equipment2
Overhead crane2
Explosion1
Fire1
Forklift1
Hot substances1
Manual tasks tools1

Note: events registered as ‘other’ or ‘Unknown’ are not included.

Ternium steel worker driving a forklift

Process safety management (PSM) analysis

Process safety management (PSM) is a blend of operational, engineering and management skills focused on preventing catastrophic accidents and near misses, particularly explosions, fires, structural collapse, and damaging releases associated with a loss of containment of energy or dangerous substances such as molten metals, fuels, and chemicals.

The manufacturing of steel involves processes with intrinsic hazards that need careful management. The measures required to control these hazards are often complex. The focus of process safety management is not limited to protecting the people within the company but also includes the environment, assets, and the surrounding community.

Table 2: Significant events benchmark

Typical process safety eventsQuantityMain causes
Fires761Inadequate Inspections
Falling of Spatter
Electric Flash
Inadequate engineering design
Strip offset/friction on cold rolling mill
Poor Housekeeping
Poor material quality
Splashing of Slag
Electrical equipment failure
Inadequate preparation of hot work
Small stockpile fires in recycling yards/scrap bins
Condition of the integrity of fuel Oil injection pipes and hoses
Continuous casting plant hydraulic fire
BOF Molten metal splash,
Chemical reaction due to the entry of fuel carbon into the combustion chamber of the electric furnace Liquid metal leakage
Explosions35LNG Gas explosion
Basket scrap having some pressurised cans.
Hydrogen explosion
Blast when loading the furnace with scrap metal.
Flammable gas accumulation
Mixing blast furnaces gas and gasoil in the boiler (human error + technical ability to do the mix)
Molten metal and water reactions78Water in the slag drum and slag handling
Ladle Breakouts, Spills, Splashes
Rainwater/snow in scrap bucket when charging
Rapid phase change Water in scrap metal
Torpedo car derailment event
Water leakage from the furnace roof’s delta area leading to water accumulation on molten slag and falling attached slag pieces from roof
Blast Furnace molten metal release related to channel damage
Gas and liquid releases  (flammable, toxic or asphyxiant gases)998Reformer Gas header rupture due to erosion.
Mechanical integrity (erosion/corrosion), valves, flanges, and pipelines.
Lack of maintenance Hydraulic systems
Gas leakage through pipelines/flanges.
CO release due to feeding mixed gas hose bottom flange cladding leakage.
Leakage of Ammonia through Cylinder Assembly
Corrosion

 

HBIS steel coils

Figure 13: Process safety management maturity assessment results 2022

The Process safety management maturity analysis was derived from data provided by 28 organisations, representing 30% of worldsteel members.

Increasing maturity in process safety management can be observed. The industry has grown in experience and expertise in process safety management; however, there is an important area of improvement for element 15 (measurement and metrics). Process safety KPIs are different from occupational safety KPIs. This issue has led to requests from worldsteel members to provide effective indicators for benchmarking and monitoring purposes. In the past, worldsteel has referenced well-accepted frameworks (e.g., RP API 754); however, a specific set of indicators and guidance will be developed.

Two steel workers in a steel plant

Sickness absence

Sickness absence [Percentage] is calculated as the total number of hours of sickness absence per total work hours. This indicator is only calculated for employees.

 

The following table shows the sickness absence per region.

Table 3: Sickness absence per region 2015 – 2022

% Sickness Absence20152016201720182019202020212022
Asia/Pacific0.120.080.080.190.150.050.110.54
CIS0.751.261.410.61.381.881.732.33*
Europe1.112.022.261.923.323.894.365.59
North America0.140.140.140.230.220.420.141.31
South America0.30.530.480.430.750.460.423.03

 

* In 2022, CIS data is derived from member companies/sites located in Ukraine and Kazakhstan

Ternium worker in a steel plant