Notes:

For terminology definitions and calculations, please refer to the worldsteel publication Safety and health principles and definitions available at worldsteel.org.

The data in this document is provisional and may be updated or supplemented with additional information.

Foreword

Welcome to the World Steel Association’s 2025 safety and health in the steel industry data report. This report is based on data provided by our members and offers crucial insights into our industry’s ongoing commitment to safety and the well-being of our workforce.

In 2024, worldsteel’s members reported 67 fatalities globally, representing a global fatal frequency rate (FFR) of 0.016, the lowest on record. Additionally, our global lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR) is at 0.70, which is also the lowest on record.

The steel industry is clearly making improvements in safety and health through learning exchanges and technology use. We are committed to achieving the goal of zero harm for employees and contractors.

Although lagging metrics are important, worldsteel consistently advises against using only these metrics as benchmarks. To support this, worldsteel endorses the adoption of evolving approaches in safety and health management used by our leading members. One of our challenges this year will be to revisit our metrics, focusing on the prevention of high-potential incidents and illness.

Our emphasis remains on process safety management (PSM) while addressing contractor vulnerabilities and fall from height incidents, the leading cause of fatalities in recent years.

Promoting holistic wellbeing in the global steel industry is crucial. We must continue striving for excellence in safety and health to ensure a safer, healthier future for everyone.

Andrew Purvis
Director, Sustainable Manufacturing

It is important that we promote a culture of holistic wellbeing for everyone in the global steel industry. Together, let us continue to strive for excellence in safety and health, ensuring a safer, healthier future for all.

worldsteel’s position on lagging indicators

The most popular lagging indicators, such as LTIFR or total recordable injury frequency rate (TRIFR), will be kept within the worldsteel reporting framework and as a reference of the industry’s general performance.

However, comparisons between organisations or local sites should not be made using LTIFR or TRIFR.

Below are the main reasons:

  • These indicators correlate poorly with the severity of accidents and injuries and do not provide a valid or reliable measure of safety and health controls and initiatives.
  • A smaller organisation’s LTIFR or TRIFR is more significantly affected by a single incident but this doesn’t necessarily indicate a more dangerous working environment.
  • Although worldsteel has a definition for lost time injury (LTI) and total recordable injury (TRI), companies vary in their definition of what constitutes an LTI and TRI.

These two indicators should not be part of individual, team or organisation objectives, bonuses, or incentives as they can foster a negative attitude towards reporting, limiting the organisational ability to learn and improve.

Liberty Steel

Potential serious injuries and fatalities (PSIF)

A serious injury is a permanent impairment or life-altering state, or an injury that, if not immediately addressed, will lead to death or permanent or long-term impairment.

A potential serious injury or fatality is a near miss incident that could have resulted in a serious injury or fatality (PSIF) if not for specific barriers or countermeasures or if one factor around the event had been changed.

A precursor of PSIF is a high-risk situation in which control methods are absent, ineffective, or not complied with, and if allowed to continue, would potentially result in a fatality or serious injury.

The number of individual sites reporting to worldsteel using of the PSIF framework has increased in recent years. The figures below only represent the sites reporting PSIFs and combining contractors and employees.

Figure 1: PSIF triangle 2024 for employees and contractors

* In 2024, there were 67 fatalities reported to worldsteel. In order to preserve the ratios within the PSIF section of this report, fatalities reported by organisations that were not able to provide PSIF information have been excluded from this analysis.

** All other injuries includes Restricted Work Cases (RWC), Medically Treated Injuries (MTI) and Minor Injuries (MI).

Stated injury statistics in this graphic are derived from companies that report PSIF information to worldsteel.

Ternium
POSCO

Total recordable injury frequency rate (TRIFR)

Total recordable incidents comprise fatalities, LTIs, RWCs and MTIs. In the data survey, restricted work cases and MTIs are reported separately. Working hours are counted only on-sites that have reported at least one RWC or MTI.

Combined Contractors Employees
2018 4.9 2.9 6.3
2019 4.8 2.9 6.2
2020 3.5 2.3 4.2
2021 4.02 2.69 4.93
2022 4.74 2.71 6.43
2023 6.20 2.63 9.31
2024 3.54 1.83 5.54
Attribute Value
1. Fatalities* 61
2. Lost time injuries 2584
3. Restricted work cases 3288
4. Medical treatment injuries 6657
5. Minor injuries 12361
6. Near misses (incidents) 195767
7. Unsafe acts and situations 3369807

* In 2024, there were 67 fatalities reported to worldsteel. In order to preserve the ratios within the TRIFR section of this report, fatalities reported by organisations that were not able to provide TRIFR information have been excluded from this analysis.

Safety pyramids can be used to compare the shape of a company’s incident triangle. In case the company triangle is narrower, it could mean that not all incidents are reported, or that fatality prevention requires more attention. It should be noted that the average incident triangle is not necessarily optimal; it should probably be wider. Reducing the number of more minor incidents does not directly reduce the probability of severe incidents, but having those reported allows action to be taken to mitigate risks that might otherwise cause severe incidents.

Figure 4: Safety pyramids 2024 for employees and contractors

Attribute Value
1. Fatalities 19
2. Lost time injuries 1778
3. Restricted work cases 2804
4. Medical treatment injuries 4478
5. Minor injuries 8572
6. Near misses 159393
7. Unsafe acts and situations 2199167
Attribute Value
1. Fatalities 42
2. Lost time injuries 806
3. Restricted work case 484
4. Medical treatment injuries 2179
5. Minor injuries 3789
6. Near misses 36374
7. Unsafe acts and situations 1170640
ArcelorMittal

Table 1: Ratio LTIs vs fatalities 2005-2024

Cause LTIs Fatalities Ratio LTIs per 1 fatality
Gassing and asphyxiation 283 144 1.97
Explosion 255 98 2.60
Rail 229 78 2.94
Fire 382 83 4.60
Electrical 502 88 5.70
Structural failure 356 58 6.14
Fall from height 2 162 330 6.55
On-site road vehicle 1 005 136 7.39
Overhead crane 1 053 107 9.84
Forklift 356 35 10.17
Moving machinery 3 349 316 10.60
Hot metal 833 69 12.07
Falling object 2 252 178 12.65
Other mobile equipment 885 56 15.80
Hot substances 670 28 23.93
Off site road vehicle 350 14 25.00
Product loading 693 18 38.50
Product handling storage 2 210 38 58.16
Exposure to chemicals 219 3 73.00
Manual tasks tools 3 655 10 365.50
Slip, trip and fall 4 495 6 749.17

 

The table shows the ratio between lost time injuries and fatalities by causes. Low ratios mean that per fatality, there are, on average, only a small amount of lost time injuries; a high ratio indicates there are many lost time injuries per fatality. If these were drawn as an incident triangle for each cause, the triangles for the low ratios would be very narrow.

These ratios show that to prevent fatalities, it is more important to undertake comprehensive and robust incident investigations and instigate preventive measures for those incidents with a low ratio. It is precisely these incidents that are most likely to lead to fatalities without effective prevention. These ratios also emphasise the usefulness of categorising potential serious injuries and fatalities among other incidents.

Baotou

Lost time injury (LTI) analysis

Any work-related injury resulting in the employee or contractor being unable to return to work for their next scheduled work period. Returning to work with work restrictions does not constitute an LTI status, no matter how minimal or severe the restrictions, provided it is at the employee’s next scheduled shift. However, if an injury deteriorates and time is later lost, a LTI should be recorded. The LTIFR is calculated by combining fatalities and LTIs.

Contractors Employees Total
2015 1151 3366 4517
2016 925 3129 4054
2017 743 2835 3578
2018 923 2429 3352
2019 1002 2211 3213
2020 881 2167 3048
2021 870 2075 2945
2022 1083 2004 3087
2023 969 1802 2771
2024 848 1797 2645
Employees Contractors Combined
2015 1.48 0.72 1.17
2016 1.21 0.64 1.01
2017 1.25 0.52 0.97
2018 1.03 0.56 0.84
2019 0.94 0.65 0.83
2020 0.87 0.60 0.77
2021 1.05 0.59 0.85
2022 1.05 0.63 0.85
2023 0.98 0.50 0.74
2024 1.01 0.43 0.70

Figure 7: Causes of LTIs 2015-2024 for employees and contractors combined

Attribute Value
Manual tasks tools 509
Slip, trip and fall 447
Moving machinery 164
Unknown 161
Falling object 153
Fall from height 138
Product handling storage 100
Hot substances 80
Object in the eye 66
Overhead crane 59
On site road vehicle 58
Hot metal 55
Other mobile equipment 53
Electrical 38
Forklift 33
Fire 29
Exposure to chemicals 21
Product loading 20
Gassing and asphyxiation 18
Structural failure 14
Explosion 13
Off site road vehicle 4
Rail 2
Attribute Value
Slip, trip and fall 2459
Manual tasks tools 2164
Moving machinery 875
Fall from height 702
Falling object 671
Product handling storage 576
Overhead crane 337
Hot substances 333
Unknown 315
On site road vehicle 288
Hot metal 223
Object in the eye 217
Other mobile equipment 190
Electrical 143
Forklift 121
Fire 119
Exposure to chemicals 116
Product loading 101
Gassing and asphyxiation 94
Explosion 82
Off site road vehicle 59
Structural failure 52
Rail 47
Attribute Value
Slip, trip and fall 4495
Manual tasks tools 3655
Moving machinery 2078
Fall from height 1444
Falling object 1359
Product handling storage 1074
Unknown 904
Overhead crane 684
Hot substances 672
On site road vehicle 623
Hot metal 496
Object in the eye 445
Other mobile equipment 417
Electrical 323
Product loading 253
Fire 226
Exposure to Chemicals 219
Off site road vehicle 217
Forklift 215
Gassing and asphyxiation 197
Explosion 142
Structural failure 119
Rail 111

The following graphs show the distribution of causes separated by employees and contractors.

Figure 8: Causes of LTIs in 2024 for employees and contractors

Attribute Value
Manual tasks tools 361
Slip, trip and fall 328
Moving machinery 126
Falling object 76
Product handling & storage 73
Fall from height 72
Hot substances 56
Object in the eye 54
Overhead crane 48
Unknown 45
Hot metal 39
On site road vehicle 32
Other mobile equipment 28
Electrical 26
Forklift 20
Fire 15
Exposure to chemicals 13
Gassing and asphyxiation 10
Product loading 8
Structural failure 5
Explosion 5
Off site road vehicle 3
Attribute Value
Manual tasks tools 148
Slip, trip and fall 119
Unknown 116
Falling object 77
Fall from height 66
Moving machinery 38
Product handling storage 27
On site road vehicle 26
Other mobile equipment 25
Hot substances 24
Hot metal 16
Fire 14
Forklift 13
Product loading 12
Object in the eye 12
Electrical 12
Overhead crane 11
Structural failure 9
Gassing and asphyxiation 8
Exposure to chemicals 8
Explosion 8
Rail 2
Off site road vehicle 1

Fatality analysis

Death from a work-related injury, certified by a medical professional. The fatality frequency rate (FFR) is calculated as the number of fatalities per million hours worked.

Employees Contractors China (indirect data) Totals
2015 53 69 32 154
2016 45 57 27 129
2017 40 49 15 104
2018 70 48 22 140
2019 32 49 18 99
2020 38 56 12 106
2021 45 55 11 111
2022 28 71 7 106
2023 25 48 9 82
2024 19 42 6 67

* Data received from China via Sinosteel Wuhan Safety & Environmental Protection Research Institute (SEPRI) does not distinguish between employees and contractors. Data received directly from Chinese worldsteel members does and is included in the analysis.

Employees Contractors Combined
2015 0.023 0.043 0.032
2016 0.017 0.040 0.025
2017 0.018 0.034 0.024
2018 0.030 0.029 0.029
2019 0.014 0.032 0.021
2020 0.015 0.038 0.024
2021 0.023 0.037 0.029
2022 0.015 0.041 0.027
2023 0.014 0.025 0.019
2024 0.011 0.021 0.016
Nucor

Figure 11: Causes of fatalities 2015-2024

Attribute Value
Fall from height 10
Moving machinery 8
On site road vehicle 6
Hot substances 6
Falling object 5
Explosion 5
Rail 4
Electrical 4
Hot metal 3
Gassing and asphyxiation 3
Overhead crane 2
Manual tasks tools 2
Structural failure 1
Other mobile equipment 1
Fire 1
Attribute Value
Fall from height 76
Moving machinery 63
Gassing and asphyxiation 37
On site road vehicle 33
Falling object 27
Overhead crane 24
Electrical 22
Structural failure 20
Explosion 19
Hot substances 16
Fire 16
Hot metal 14
Rail 10
Other mobile equipment 10
Forklift 6
Product handling storage 5
Manual tasks tools 4
Exposure to chemicals 3
Slips, trips and falls 2
Off site road vehicle 2
Product loading 1
Attribute Value
Fall from height 164
Moving machinery 139
On site road vehicle 77
Gassing and asphyxiation 76
Falling object 67
Overhead crane 45
Electrical 41
Fire 37
Hot metal 35
Explosion 30
Structural failure 29
Rail 28
Hot substances 28
Other mobile equipment 20
Forklift 14
Product handling storage 12
Manual tasks tools 10
Slips, trips and falls 6
Product loading 6
Off site road vehicle 6
Exposure to chemicals 3
Unknown 1

The top 5 causes of fatalities over the past decade were falling from height, moving machinery, on-site road vehicles, gassing, and asphyxiation and falling objects. These are consistent over time.

The following graphs show the distribution of causes split by employees and contractors.

Attribute Value
Explosion 4
On-site road vehicle 3
Rail 2
Gassing and asphyxiation 2
Fall from height 2
Overhead crane 1
Moving machinery 1
Manual tasks tools 1
Hot metal 1
Fire 1
Falling object 1
Electrical 1
Attribute Value
Fall from height 8
Moving machinery 7
Hot substances 6
Falling object 4
On-site road vehicle 3
Electrical 3
Rail 2
Hot metal 2
Structural failure 1
Overhead crane 1
Other mobile equipment 1
Manual tasks tools 1
Gassing asphyxiation 1
Explosion 1
Harsco

Process safety management (PSM) analysis

Process safety management (PSM) is a blend of operational, engineering and management skills focused on preventing catastrophic accidents and near misses, particularly explosions, fires, structural collapse, and damaging releases associated with a loss of containment of energy or dangerous substances such as molten metals, fuels, and chemicals.

The manufacturing of steel involves processes with intrinsic hazards that need careful management. The measures required to control these hazards are often complex. The focus of process safety management is not limited to protecting the people within the company but also includes the environment, assets, and the surrounding community.

Figure 13: PSM maturity assessment results 2024

The process safety management maturity analysis was derived from data provided by 36 organisations, representing 35.6% of worldsteel members.

Increasing maturity in process safety management can be observed. The industry has grown in experience and expertise in process safety management.

However, there are some important areas of improvement for elements 03 (stakeholders), 15 (measurement and metrics), and 16 (auditing). Process Safety KPIs are different from Occupational Safety KPIs. A specific set of indicators and guidance are being developed for process safety.

Table 2: Significant process safety events 2024

Fires Explosions Molten metal and water reactions Gas and liquid
releases
Quantity 491 59 107 1 011
Gerdau

Sickness absence

Sickness absence [percentage] is calculated as the total number of hours of sickness absence per total work hours. This indicator is only calculated for employees.

The following table shows the sickness absence per region.

Table 3: Sickness absence per region 2015 – 2024

% Sickness Absence 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Africa and Middle East (AME) 0.13 0.25 0.23 0.29 1.06 0.18 1.01 1.53 2.80 1.19
Asia/Pacific 0.12 0.08 0.08 0.19 0.15 0.05 0.11 0.69 0.58 0.06
Russia & other CIS + Ukraine 0.75 1.26 1.41 0.6 1.38 1.88 1.73 2.33 2.21 1.66
Europe 1.11 2.02 2.26 1.92 3.32 3.89 4.36 6.38 3.84 3.25
North America 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.23 0.22 0.42 0.14 1.31 1.27 3.5
South America 0.3 0.53 0.48 0.43 0.75 0.46 0.42 3.03 1.59 1.28

 

JSW
Usiminas